Bhagavad Gita - Chapter Two:
Contents Of Gita Summarized
![]()
Text 21
Sanskrit working:English Wording:
0 Partha, how can a person who knows that the soul is indestructible, eternal, unborn and immutable kill anyone or cause anyone to kill?
Purport: Therefore, the king's punishment of hanging a murderer is actually beneficial. Similarly, when Krishna orders fighting, it must be concluded that violence is for supreme justice, and thus Arjun should follow the instruction, knowing well that such violence, committed in the act of fighting for Krishna, is not violence at all because, at any rate, the man, or rather the soul, cannot be killed; so for the administration of justice, so-called violence is permitted. A surgical operation is not meant to kill the patient, but to cure him. Therefore the fighting to be executed by Arjun at the instruction of Krishna is with full knowledge, so there is no possibility of sinful reaction. Text 22
Sanskrit working: English Wording:
As a person puts on new garments, giving up old ones, the soul similarly accepts new material bodies, giving up the old and useless ones. Purport: Change of body by the atomic individual soul is an accepted fact. Even the modern scientists who do not believe in the existence of the soul, but at the same time cannot explain the source of energy from the heart, have to accept continuous changes of body which appear from childhood to boyhood and from boyhood to youth and again from youth to old age. From old age, the change is transferred to an- other body. This has already been explained in a previous verse (2.13). Transference of the atomic individual soul to another body is made possible by the grace of the Supersoul. The Supersoul fulfills the desire of the atomic soul as one friend fulfills the desire of another. The Vedas, like the Mundaka Upanishad, as well as the Svetdsvatara Upanishad, compare the soul and the Supersoul to two friendly birds sitting on the same tree. One of the birds (the individual atomic soul) is eating the fruit of the tree, and the other bird (Krishna) is simply watching His friend. Of these two birds—although they are the same in quality—one is captivated by the fruits of the material tree, while the other is simply witnessing the activities of His friend. Krishna is the witnessing bird, and Arjun is the eating bird. Although they are friends, one is still the master and the other is the servant. Forgetfulness of this relationship by the atomic soul is the cause of one's changing his position from one tree to another, or from one body to another. The jiva soul is struggling very hard on the tree of the material body, but as soon as he agrees to accept the other bird as the supreme spiritual master—as Arjun agreed to do by voluntary surrender unto Krishna for instruction—the subordinate bird immediately becomes free from all lamentations. Both the Mundaka Upanishad (3.1.2) and Svetasvatara Upanishad (4.7) con- firm this: "Although the two birds are in the same tree, the eating bird is fully engrossed with anxiety and moroseness as the enjoyer of the fruits of the tree. But if in some way or other he turns his face to his friend who is the Lord and knows His glories—at once the suffering bird becomes free from all anxieties." Arjun has now turned his face towards his eternal friend, Krishna, and is understanding the Bhagavad-Gita from Him. And thus, hearing from Krishna, he can understand the supreme glories of the Lord and be free from lamentation. Arjun is advised herewith by the Lord not to lament for the bodily change of his old grandfather and his teacher. He should rather be happy to kill their bodies in the righteous fight so that they may be cleansed at once of all reactions from various bodily activi- ties. One who lays down his life on the sacrificial altar, or in the proper battlefield, is at once cleansed of bodily reactions and pro- moted to a higher status of life. So there was no cause for Arjun's lamentation.
Text 23
Sanskrit working: English Wording:
The soul can never be cut to pieces by any weapon, nor burned I fire, nor moistened by water, nor withered by the wind.
Purport:
The Mayavadi cannot explain how the individual soul came in
existence simply by ignorance and consequently became covered I
illusory energy. Nor was it ever possible to cut the individual soul
from the original Supreme Soul; rather, the individual souls a
eternally separated parts of the Supreme Soul. Because they a
atomic individual souls eternally (sanatana), they are prone to I
covered by the illusory energy, and thus they become separated fro
the association of the Supreme Lord, just as the sparks of a fir
although one in quality with the fire, are prone to be extinguish
when out of the fire. In the Varaha Purdna, the living entities a
described as separated parts and parcels of the Supreme. They a
eternally so, according to the Bhagavad-Gita also. So, even aft
being liberated from illusion, the living entity remains a separate
identity, as is evident from the teachings of the Lord to Arjun
Arjun became liberated by the knowledge received from Krishna, b
he never became one with Krishna.
English Wording:
This individual soul is unbreakable and insoluble, and can be neither burned nor dried. He is everlasting, present everywhere, unchangeable, immovable and eternally the same.
Purport: The word sarva-gata ("all-pervading") is significant because there is no doubt that living entities are all over God's creation. They live on the land, in the water, in the air, within the earth and even within fire. The belief that they are sterilized in fire is not acceptable, because it is clearly stated here that the soul cannot be burned" by fire. Therefore, there is no doubt that there are living entities also in the sun planet with suitable bodies to live there. If the sun globe is un- inhabited, then the word sarva-gata—"living everywhere"—becomes meaningless.
English Wording:
It is said that the soul is invisible, inconceivable and immutable. Knowing this, you should not grieve for the body.
Purport: There are many things we have to accept solely on grounds of superior authority. No one can deny the existence of his father, based upon the authority of his mother. There is no source of understanding the identity of the father except by the authority of the mother. Similarly, there is no source of understanding the soul except by studying the Vedas. In other words, the soul is inconceivable by human experimental knowledge. The soul is consciousness and conscious—that also is the statement of the Vedas, and we have to accept that. Unlike the bodily changes, there is no change in the soul. As eternally unchangeable, the soul remains atomic in comparison to the infinite Supreme Soul. The Supreme Soul is infinite, and the atomic soul is infinitesimal. Therefore, the infinitesimal soul, being unchangeable, can never become equal to the infinite soul, or the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This concept is repeated in the Vedas in different ways just to confirm the stability of the conception of the soul. Repetition of something is necessary in order that we understand the matter thoroughly, without error.
Text 26
Sanskrit working:English Wording:
If, however, you think that the soul [or the symptoms of life] is always born and dies forever, you still have no reason to lament, 0 mighty-armed.
Purport: Even if Arjun did not believe in the existence of the soul—as in the vaibhdsika philosophy—there would still have been no cause for lamentation. No one laments the loss of a certain bulk of chemicals and stops discharging his prescribed duty. On the other hand, in modern science and scientific warfare, so many tons of chemicals are wasted for achieving victory over the enemy. According to the vaibhdsika philosophy, the so-called soul or dtma vanishes along with the deterioration of the body. So, in any case, whether Arjun accepted the Vedic conclusion that there is an atomic soul or he did not believe in the existence of the soul, he had no reason to lament. According to this theory, since there are so many living entities generating out of matter every moment, and so many of them are being vanquished every moment, there is no need to grieve for such incidents. If there were no rebirth for the soul, Arjun had no reason to be afraid of being affected by sinful reactions due to his killing hi& grandfather and teacher. But at the same time, Krishna sarcastically addressed Arjun as mahd-bahu, mighty-armed, because He, at least, did not accept the theory of the vaibhdsikas, which leaves aside the Vedic wisdom. As a ksatriya, Arjun belonged to the Vedic culture, and it behooved him to continue to follow its principles.
Text 27
Sanskrit working:
One who has taken his birth is sure to die, and after death one is sure to take birth again. Therefore, in the unavoidable discharge of your duty, you should not lament.
Purport: The Battle of Kuruksetra, being the will of the Supreme, was an inevitable event, and to fight for the right cause is the duty of a ksatriya. Why should he be afraid of or aggrieved at the death of his relatives since he was discharging his proper duty? He did not deserve to break the law, thereby becoming subjected to the reactions of sinful acts, of which he was so afraid. By avoiding the discharge of his proper duty, he would not be able to stop the death of his relatives, and he would be degraded due to his selection of the wrong path of action.
English Wording:
All created beings are unmanifest in their beginning, manifest in their interim state, and unmanifest again when annihilated. So what need is there for lamentation?
Purport: When it is dismantled, the manifestation becomes again unmanifested and remains as atoms in the ultimate stage. The law of conservation of energy remains, but in course of time things are manifested and unmanifested—that is the difference. Then what cause is there for lamentation either in the stage of manifestation 01 in unmanifestation? Somehow or other, even in the unmanifested stage, things are not lost. Both at the beginning and at the end, all elements remain unmanifested, and only in the middle are they manifested, and this does not make any real material difference. And if we accept the Vedic conclusion as stated in the Bhagavad-Gita that these material bodies are perishable in due course of time vut that the soul is eternal (nityasyoktah saririnah), then we must remember always that the body is like a dress; therefore why lament the changing of a dress? The material body has no factual existence in relation to the eternal soul. It is something like a dream. In a dream we may think of flying in the sky, or sitting on a chariot as a king, but when we wake up we can see that we are neither in the sky nor seated on the chariot. The Vedic wisdom encourages self-realization on the basis of the nonexistence of the material body. Therefore, in either case, whether one believes in the existence of the soul or one does not believe in the existence of the soul, there is no cause for lamentation for loss of the body.
Text 29
Sanskrit working:English Wording:
Some look on the soul as amazing, some describe him as amazing, and some hear of him as amazing, while others, even after hearing about him, cannot understand him at all.
Purport: Some people who are inclined to hear about the soul may be attending lectures, in good association, but sometimes, owing to ignorance, they are misguided by acceptance of the Supersoul and the atomic soul as one without distinction of magnitude. It is very difficult to find a man who perfectly understands the position of the Supersoul, the atomic soul, their respective functions and relation- ships and all other major and minor details. And it is still more difficult to find a man who has actually derived full benefit from knowledge of the soul, and who is able to describe the position of the soul in different aspects. But if, somehow or other, one is able to understand the subject matter of the soul, .then one's life is successful. The easiest process for understanding the subject matter of self, however, is to accept the statements of the Bhagavad-Gita spoken by the greatest authority. Lord Krishna, without being deviated by other theories. But it also requires a great deal of penance and sacrifice, either in this life or in the previous ones, before one is able to accept Krishna as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Krishna can, however, be known as such by the causeless mercy of the pure devotee and by no other way.
Sanskrit working:
English wording:
0 descendant of Bharat, he who dwells in the body can never be slain. Therefore you need not grieve for any living being.
Purport:
|
| About Us | |
| Bulk Discounts | |
| Contact Us | |
| Disclaimer | |
| Feedback | |
| Links | | |
| Our Mantra | |
| Press Coverage | |
| Shipping Info. | |
| Shipping Rates | |
| Email Page | |
| Print Page | |
| Add To Favorites | |